Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

A boy decides to go to hell for his friend, and then the book that made him do it loses its nerve.

Contents
  1. In brief
  2. The argument
  3. The shape of the book
  4. The voice
  5. Jim
  6. The ending
  7. The word and the bans
  8. The people
  9. How it was made
  10. Readers and critics
  11. Afterlives
  12. How to read it
  13. Read next
  14. In one line

In brief

A white boy of about thirteen, escaping a drunken father, and a Black man, escaping sale down the river, share a raft on the Mississippi some twenty years before the Civil War. Mark Twain tells it entirely in the boy’s own voice, and that voice changed American prose. The boy also believes everything his slaveholding town taught him, including that helping his friend is a sin, and the novel’s moral drama is what happens when he acts against his beliefs without ever ceasing to hold them.

It is a great book with a serious fault, and it should not be defended by pretending otherwise. For most of its length it is the sharpest attack on slavery’s moral education in American fiction. In its last dozen chapters it turns a man’s freedom into a boy’s game. It also uses the racial slur of its time 212 times, and it has been challenged in schools for that reason for decades. None of these facts cancels the others.

The argument

Twain gave the argument himself. In a notebook of about 1895, preparing a lecture tour, he called it a book “where a sound heart & a deformed conscience come into collision & conscience suffers defeat”. The important word is deformed. Huck’s conscience is not absent. It works hard, and what it tells him is that Miss Watson owns Jim and that helping him escape is theft from an old woman who never harmed him.

The crisis comes in ch. 31. The king has sold Jim for “forty dirty dollars”. Huck tries to pray, finds that “You can’t pray a lie”, writes to Miss Watson to give Jim up, and feels washed clean. Then he remembers the raft, holds the letter, and knows he has “got to decide, forever, betwixt two things”. His answer is the most famous sentence in the book: “All right, then, I’ll go to hell”. There is no enlightenment in it. He concludes not that slavery is wrong but that he is wicked. “It was awful thoughts and awful words, but they was said.”

Huck’s heart wins with no help from any idea, and he thinks he has damned himself. Only the reader can see what the town has done to him.

The shape of the book

The book has three movements. The first (ch. 1–7) is St Petersburg and the faked murder that frees Huck. The second (ch. 8–31) is the river, with a simple rhythm. The raft is a refuge; the shore is where things go wrong. Each landing is a small anatomy of the South: the Grangerfords and Shepherdsons, who take their guns to a sermon on brotherly love (ch. 18); Bricksville, where Colonel Sherburn shoots a harmless drunk and faces down the lynch mob with “The average man’s a coward” (ch. 22); the king and the duke robbing the Wilks orphans (ch. 24–29).

Between landings the days “swum by, they slid along so quiet and smooth and lovely”, and the two lie on their backs arguing about whether the stars “was made or only just happened” (ch. 19). The third movement (ch. 32–43), at the Phelps farm, abandons all this.

The plot has a hole that everyone notices: heading south takes a fugitive deeper into slavery. Cairo, where the Ohio would have carried Jim north, is passed unseen in the fog, as ch. 16 reveals, and after that the journey has no rational destination.

The voice

“You don’t know about me without you have read a book by the name of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer; but that ain’t no matter” (ch. 1). The manuscript shows Twain working toward that sentence through more formal versions. An uneducated vernacular speaker narrates a whole serious novel and is never put between the quotation marks of a superior author. Hemingway’s line, from Green Hills of Africa (1935), is the famous verdict: “All modern American literature comes from” this book.

Huck reports without understanding, so the reader must do the judging, and comedy is the method of attack. In ch. 32 Huck invents a steamboat accident for Aunt Sally. “Good gracious! anybody hurt?” she asks. Huck says no, and in the same breath, using the slur, that it killed one Black man. “Well, it’s lucky; because sometimes people do get hurt.” That exchange does more against racial contempt than any speech, because a kind woman says it and a boy who loves Jim sets it up.

Jim

Jim is where the book’s reputation is decided, and Twain’s portrait of him is divided. On the river he is a full person. He reasons that he is rich because “I owns mysef, en I’s wuth eight hund’d dollars” (ch. 8). In ch. 14 he demolishes Solomon’s wisdom: “De ’spute warn’t ’bout a half a chile, de ’spute was ’bout a whole chile”, and a man with children to spare does not value them, a remarkable thing for an enslaved father to say. Huck dismisses him, and the reader sees that Jim won.

Two scenes go further. After Huck fools him about the fog, Jim tells him that “trash is what people is dat puts dirt on de head er dey fren’s en makes ’em ashamed” (ch. 15). Huck takes fifteen minutes to bring himself to apologise, “and I warn’t ever sorry for it afterwards, neither”. In ch. 23 Jim tells how he struck his small daughter for not obeying before discovering that scarlet fever had left her deaf. Huck’s comment shows how far he has come and how far he has not: “I do believe he cared just as much for his people as white folks does for their’n. It don’t seem natural, but I reckon it’s so.”

But Jim is also drawn with the materials of the minstrel show: the superstition played for laughs, the witches and the hair-ball, the spelling that marks his speech more heavily than that of illiterate white characters. Ralph Ellison argued that Jim’s humanity emerges from behind the blackface mask that Twain inherited and could not wholly take off. And Huck’s highest praise, when Jim refuses to leave the wounded Tom, is “I knowed he was white inside” (ch. 40). That sentence is Huck’s, but the book never corrects it.

The ending

At the Phelps farm Tom Sawyer arrives and takes over. Jim is locked in a hut whose key Huck could easily steal, and Tom makes the escape last for weeks by following adventure books: a journal in blood, rattlesnakes, a coat of arms, a tunnel dug with case-knives. Jim “couldn’t see no sense in the most of it, but he allowed we was white folks and knowed better than him” (ch. 36). The man who risked his life for his family becomes a prop, and Huck, who chose hell, goes along with it.

Then the trick is revealed. Miss Watson has died and “set him free in her will”, and Tom knew all along. Asked why he did it, he says, “Why, I wanted the adventure of it” (ch. 42). Tom pays Jim forty dollars “for being prisoner for us so patient” (ch. 43), the same sum the king sold him for, and Jim is “pleased most to death”. Nothing Huck decided in ch. 31 has any effect on the outcome.

Hemingway told readers to stop where Jim is taken from the boys: “The rest is just cheating.” Lionel Trilling and T. S. Eliot, in essays of around 1950, defended the ending as formally apt, returning the book to the comic mood of its opening. Leo Marx answered them in “Mr. Eliot, Mr. Trilling, and Huckleberry Finn” (1953), arguing that the ending is an evasion that betrays the moral weight of the journey. A later reading makes the failure the point: Twain finished in 1883, the year the Supreme Court struck down the Civil Rights Act of 1875, and a Black man legally free but kept in chains for white amusement looks very like the end of Reconstruction.

I do not think that rescues the chapters, which are long, facetious and not written in anger. The book cannot imagine a free Jim. Toni Morrison, in Playing in the Dark (1992), made the harder point that Huck’s freedom takes its meaning from Jim’s lack of it. Huck’s last words are “I reckon I got to light out for the Territory ahead of the rest”. Jim has no such option.

The word and the bans

The first objections had nothing to do with race. In March 1885 the Concord Public Library in Massachusetts excluded the book, its committee calling it “the veriest trash” and “more suited to the slums than to intelligent, respectable people”. Twain wrote to his publisher that the publicity would sell 25,000 copies.

The modern objection is far more serious. In 1957 New York City’s schools let the book drop from their approved textbook lists, and the NAACP objected to its racial slurs. In 1982 a committee at, of all places, the Mark Twain Intermediate School in Fairfax County, Virginia, recommended dropping it, and an administrator there called it the most grotesque example of racism he had seen. The American Library Association listed it as the fifth most challenged book of the 1990s. In 2011 NewSouth Books published an edition, edited by the Twain scholar Alan Gribben, that replaced the word with “slave”.

The defence is that Huck’s language is the point: the word is what his world called Jim, and hearing it from a boy who loves Jim is the indictment. That is true and not sufficient. A novel can attack racism and still be painful for a Black twelve-year-old to read aloud in a mostly white classroom. The answer is not to print “slave”, which falsifies the book, and it is not to dismiss the parents. Morrison, whose 1996 introduction is known by the title “This Amazing, Troubling Book”, insisted that what it cannot be is dismissed, and those are the right two adjectives. It needs a prepared teacher or an older reader.

The people

Huck Finn

Huck is a great liar, inventing families, disasters and a smallpox raft on the spot to survive. His central quality is a pity that nothing has trained into him. He even feels for the king and duke when they are tarred and feathered: “Human beings can be awful cruel to one another” (ch. 33).

Tom Sawyer

Tom is a respectable boy who lives by books. Huck is amazed that he would stoop to stealing a slave, and sees it as a loss of character (ch. 34). The joke is on both of them: Tom is not stooping, since he knows Jim is free. He is what the town calls a good boy, and his cruelty never occurs to him.

Pap

Pap Finn is the white South’s id. His rant in ch. 6, about a free Black professor who is allowed to vote, “Oh, yes, this is a wonderful govment, wonderful”, is an exact portrait of a man whose sole asset is his race. He is dead by ch. 9, which only Jim knows.

The king and the duke

These two frauds are funny until they sell Jim. Huck’s verdict is “All kings is mostly rapscallions” (ch. 23).

How it was made

Samuel Clemens began it in the summer of 1876 at Quarry Farm in Elmira, New York, directly after Tom Sawyer. By the usual account he stopped not long after the steamboat smashes the raft in ch. 16, and told William Dean Howells he might pigeonhole or burn it. A trip down the Mississippi in 1882 for Life on the Mississippi gave him what he needed; he finished in 1883. A raftsmen’s episode written for this novel went into chapter 3 of that travel book instead, and this text goes without it.

It appeared in Britain and Canada on 10 December 1884 and in the United States on 18 February 1885, through Twain’s own firm. The first half of the manuscript, long thought lost, turned up in a trunk in 1991.

The title page gives the time as “Forty to fifty years ago”, which puts it in Twain’s own Missouri boyhood. He later wrote that he had drawn Jim from Uncle Dan’l, an enslaved man on his uncle’s farm, and Shelley Fisher Fishkin’s Was Huck Black? (1993) argues that Huck’s voice owes a real debt to Black speakers Twain listened to. In 1885, the year of publication, Twain also paid the expenses of Warner McGuinn, a Black student at Yale Law School, as a debt he felt white people owed.

Readers and critics

The book’s elevation came much later, with Hemingway, Trilling and Eliot, and Marx and Ellison were complicating it almost at once. Jane Smiley’s “Say It Ain’t So, Huck” (Harper’s, 1996) argues that it hardly deserves the rank, and that Stowe took slavery more seriously. Jonathan Arac’s phrase “idol and target” catches what the argument has become: a dispute over who gets to say what America’s conscience looks like.

Afterlives

The films soften it: Mickey Rooney with Rex Ingram in 1939, Elijah Wood with Courtney B. Vance in 1993. The Broadway musical Big River (1985), with songs by Roger Miller, won the Tony for Best Musical.

The most important reply is Percival Everett’s James (2024), which won the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize. It gives the story to Jim, who reads, thinks and speaks standard English in private, and performs the dialect for white listeners because his life depends on it. Everett turns the minstrel mask from a fault of Twain’s into a survival skill of Jim’s, and gives him the story of his own that the Phelps chapters could not.

How to read it

  • Read chapters 15, 16, 23 and 31 together. They are Huck’s moral education in four steps, and they are the book’s strongest case.
  • Do not stop where Hemingway told you to. Read the ending and be annoyed by it; its failure is part of the evidence.
  • Find an annotated edition. Michael Patrick Hearn’s Annotated Huckleberry Finn or the University of California Press text gives the history behind the jokes. Avoid editions that change the words.
  • Percival Everett, James (2024). The same river from the raft’s other passenger, and the best argument with Twain ever written.
  • Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass (1845). What Twain’s comedy leaves out, told by someone who lived it.
  • Mark Twain, Pudd’nhead Wilson (1894). His bleaker return to slavery, built on two babies swapped in the cradle.
  • Harriet Beecher Stowe, Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1852). The book Twain’s is measured against.
  • Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man (1952). A Black American vernacular epic by the critic who read Twain best.
In one line

Huck tears up the letter and Twain cannot quite follow him: the greatness and the failure are the same book, and it asks to be read with both in view.